Titolo 1

ndirectly affected through its EU subsidiaries, the provision of services in the EU and market pressures.? SFDR is part of the EU Action Plan on Financing Sustainable Growth, with an overarching goal of providing a link between finance and sustainability. It was introduced to encourage and improve transparency in the sustainable investment markets and to prevent greenwashing.

 

WHO? The regulation applies to financial market participants (FMPs) and financial advisors. Any company that offers and develops financial products needs to report SFDR in addition to existing disclosure obligations of the financial undertaking of their products. Although it applies mainly to companies operating in the EU, non-EU companies will be indirectly affected through its EU subsidiaries, the provision of services in the EU and market pressures.

 

WHEN? Following the introduction of SFDR Level 1, the Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for SFDR Level 2 were published and are mandatory from January 2023. SFDR Level 2 is still being developed but approval is expected in the medium term, with implementation expected this year.

 

HOW?

 

Under SFDR, investment products are classified as one of the following:

​

Article 8 (Light Green) funds integrating ESG factors, considered to be more focused on financial materiality

 

Article 9 (Dark Green) funds focusing on sustainable economic activities or impact, and/or aiming to reduce carbon emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.

Article 6 (All other funds) with no specific ESG considerations integrated into the investment process.

 

 

REPORTING: SFDR requires companies to disclose any ESG factors that are being adopted in their decision-making processes.

 

SFDR applies different disclosure requirements and implementation timeframes depending on the type of content information is being expressed in:

Pre-contractual disclosures & Marketing Materials (and if not relevant, why)

Periodic report

 

​

Way in which sustainability risks areintegrated into their investment decisionsand the results of that assessment (Article6,8,9).

 

Must publish a clear and concise reason why sustainability risks on the returns of the financial products are not relevant (Articles6,8,9).

Sustainability Risk Policy –Information on the integration ofsustainability risks in theirinvestment decision-makingprocess ( Articles 8,9).

 

( Article 6 & 8; and if notrelevant, why).

 

When “principal adversesustainability impacts” arebeing considered, statementswith their due diligence policies (Articles 6,8,9).

 

( Article 6 & 8; and if notrelevant, why).

 

Principal adverse impactsstatement ( Articles 6,8,9).

FMPs

 

(Product Level)

Information on products pursuing sustainable objectives (Article 9 products) or promoting E&S characteristics (Article 8 products).

 

Information on how sustainableobjectives or E&Scharacteristics are met(Articles 8,9).

 

​

​

Sustainability Risk

 

Sustainability Risk Policyintegration in the investmentdecision-making.

 

Sustainability Risk Policy integration inthe investment or insurance advice.

Disclose the manner in whichSustainability Risks are integrated intotheir decision-making and assessmentof the likely result of it on the returns ofthe product.

 

 

PAI ((Principal Adverse Impacts)

 

* minimum of 16 indicatorsconsisting of 14 mandatory(nine environmental and fivesocial) and two additional.

Considerations of PAIsinvestment decisions on differentsustainability factors.

 

Due Diligence policy statement.

 

Mandatory for large companies(more than 500 employees) andcomply and explain for smallerones.

​

Disclose how each financial productconsiders the adverse impact onsustainability factors.

 

Sustainability Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR), Taxonomy Regulations (EU Taxonomy) & Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directives (CSRD)

 

These regulations require FMPs and asset managers to be transparent on sustainability and impose mandatory ESG disclosure. Taxonomy Regulation on the other hand sets out criteria for identifying if an activity is environmentally sustainable, including whether the activity contributes to, or does significantharm to, one or more of the below environmental objectives:

 

Climate chage mitigation Climate change adaptation

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources

 

Transition to a circular economy (including waste prevention and recycling) Pollution prevention and control

Protection of health ecosystems

 

 

In October 2021 the EU published a draft RTS which provides guidance and templates relating to pre-contractual and periodic disclosure for Article 8 and Article 9 products.

 

Although the Taxonomy’s ‘Do No Significant Harm’ (DNSH) statement relates to harm on other environmental objectives not pursued, Disclosure Regulations’ DNSH is more in line with the minimum precautions of the Taxonomy. As per the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA’s) FinalReport on the draft RTS, DNSH reporting must show whether investments are aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Declaration of the International Labour Organization on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the International Bill of Human Rights. In addition to having good governance practice.

 

In September 2022, ESMA duly delivered its first report, with amendments for financial products exposed to investment in nuclear and gas activities now aligned with the Taxonomy regulation (TR).

 

All product disclosure templates (per RTS Annexes II, III, IV, V) have been revised to include:

 

New indicators of financial products investing in fossil gas and/or nuclear energy.

 

Updated graphs depicting these investments (aligned with the Taxonomy, including key performance indicators). Additional information must also be included in financial product website disclosures (per RTS Chapter IV).

 

Furthermore, Article 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation requires companies covered by the current Non-Financial Reporting Directive (as well as any new companies covered by the CSRD) to report on the sustainability of their operations. Companies will be required to submit these metrics in addition to other ESG/sustainability data required by the CSRD.

 

These three regulations are directly linked to each other. Corporations subject to CSRD are required to make Taxonomy-related disclosures; their reporting is directed via financial market participants, who are subject to SFDR reporting obligations which also includes Taxonomy- related disclosures.

 

ESG Related Fund Names

 

In November 2022, ESMA, the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, announced a consultation and draft guidelines on the use of ESG/Sustainability-related terms in a fund’s name, to avoid confusion or deceptive fund names.

 

The draft included elements of guidelines where:

 

Fund names which contain ESG-related words should have a minimum threshold of 80% of its investments meeting a specific goal or objective.

An additional threshold (minimum of 50% investment) as defined in SFDR, for the use of “sustainable” or any sustainability-related term only, as part of the 80% threshold.

Funds that are using an index as a reference are allowed, only if they use the same benchmarks and criteria met by the fund (or exclusion criteria provided in the name).

When a Fund is using the word ‘impact’ or the term ‘impact investing’, it should meet the proposed benchmark, and make investments with the intention on generating measurable socially and environmentally positive results alongside the financials.

 

This consultation ends in February 2023 with final guidance provided by Q2-3 2023, before becoming applicable three months later. A six month transitional period will then be given for funds in scope.

 

One of the main positive impacts of upcoming mandatory disclosure reporting is that every company will need to be accountable and transparent when it comes to ESG and sustainability. And this greater scrutiny has led to fund managers across the globe to re-evaluate the classifications of their funds, from Article 9 to Article 8 for example – an activity which has become known as ‘The Great Reclassification’.

 

As of November 2022, more than 130 funds have been downgraded to Article 8 as they either failed to meet the necessary criteria, or are not able to provide the necessary statistics to verify their success in this area.

 

With the final date to report on SFDR (30 June 2023) fast approaching, please contact us if you’d like to discuss howAztec can support you with your ESG data and reporting needs. We can help you identify the most relevant ESG factors for your business